Love, hate, or somewhere in between?
It’s hard to tell whether the hyenas really love or really hate my cameras.
To be fair, I have seen hyenas absconding with everything from flip-flops to sofa cushions – and there was an unforgettable night where our neighbors were awakened by the crashing about of a hyena who had gotten his head stuck in a mop bucket. The world is their chew toy.
One of our favorite things about camera traps is that they are relatively noninvasive – we think of them as candid cameras, unobtrusively watching the secret lives of Serengeti’s most elusive animals. We don’t bait our cameras to attract animals: we want to capture the natural behaviors of the animals to understand how they are using their landscape – what types of habitat features they prefer, and whether they alter their patterns of use at different times of day, at different times of the year, or in areas where there are lots of competitors or predators.
But it’s a fair question to ask whether the cameras affect animal behavior, and an important one. Stanford graduate student Eric Abelson, is hoping to answer it. If the animals are being attracted to or avoiding areas with cameras, that could change how we interpret our data. In wildlife research, this is known as being trap-happy or trap-shy. For example, say we want to estimate the population size of leopards in Serengeti. Since leopards have unique spot patterns, we can use what is known as Mark-Recapture analysis to calculate the total number of leopards based on the rates that we “re-capture” (or re-photograph) the same individual leopard. Because of the way that the math works out, if animals become trap-shy – avoiding camera traps after an initial encounter — then we would overestimate the total number of individuals in a population.
Fortunately, although researchers in other systems sometimes find trap-shy animals (baby tigers in Nepal, for example), our Serengeti animals don’t seem too bothered – at least not to the point where they avoid an area after encountering a camera trap. Even at night, with the flash firing away, we get photo after photo of the same bunch of playful lion cubs, or repeat visits by the same leopard, cheetah, lion, or hyena week after week.
Also, since the cameras aren’t baited, we don’t think that they’re drawn to the cameras from long distances. Instead, we think that once the animals are close to the camera, they come a little closer to investigate thoroughly.
Hope you enjoy the view!
6 responses to “Love, hate, or somewhere in between?”
Trackbacks / Pingbacks
- March 13, 2013 -
Well, I think we can be assured that the hartebeest don’t care at all about the cameras! I think I got a capture of a lion vandalizing one of them, so it’s not just the heyenas. http://talk.snapshotserengeti.org/#/subjects/ASG0006b5j
Love the lion’s curiousity! Here’s a curious Wildebeest. http://www.snapshotserengeti.org/subjects/standard/50dcb2fea2fc8e37890d05db_1.jpg
The Wildebeests don’t seem at all fazed by the cameras. I have seen gazelles that are seemingly startled by the cameras.
I saw a very up close and personal image of what looked like a cheetah scent-marking the camera.
So, do we mark these up and close pics as “interacting” ?
Something that has come up a couple of times on the project discussion boards, and which I’ve wondered about myself, is – do the cameras make any sound when they go off? Like the small artificial shutter click that digital cameras make? Many animals seem to ignore the camera, but now and then we see a creature react in what appears to be a startled manner (e.g. the cheetah in this image set : http://talk.snapshotserengeti.org/#/subjects/ASG0000ezr ).